News

Every strata scheme runs on one of two maintenance models, whether committees have chosen it deliberately or not. Planned maintenance follows a schedule built around asset condition and risk. Reactive maintenance waits for something to fail, then responds. The difference sounds procedural, but it shows up directly in cost, safety exposure and how predictable levies are from year to year.

Planned And Reactive Maintenance Defined

Planned maintenance is scheduled work carried out ahead of failure, based on asset age, condition and manufacturer guidance, sitting inside a scheme's broader repair and maintenance program. Reactive maintenance is unscheduled work triggered by a breakdown, complaint or visible failure. Most schemes run a mix of both, but the balance between them says a lot about how well a building's long-term costs are being managed. Neither model is inherently wrong for every situation, but a scheme that never reviews which one it is defaulting to tends to drift further into reactive territory over time without anyone deciding that outcome deliberately.

Cost Profile Of Each Approach

Planned maintenance tends to cost less over time because small issues are caught and fixed before they escalate, and contractors can be booked at standard rates rather than emergency call-out prices. Reactive maintenance carries a premium on almost every front, including after-hours labour, expedited parts, temporary fixes that need to be redone properly later, and sometimes consequential damage from the original failure. A scheme that runs mostly reactive is often pays more in total, just less visibly, because the extra cost is spread across dozens of smaller invoices rather than showing up as one obvious line item.

Timing and Scheduling Considerations

Planned maintenance also runs to a timing advantage that is easy to overlook. Servicing can be scheduled during quieter periods, contractors can be booked around residents' routines rather than at the worst possible moment, and works can be bundled together to reduce the number of separate site visits and access disruptions.

 Reactive maintenance, by contrast, happens on the failure's timetable, not the building's, which often means work is squeezed in at short notice, during peak usage, or in a way that creates more disruption to residents than necessary. Over a full maintenance cycle, that difference in timing adds up to fewer access requests, fewer disrupted mornings for owners, and a more predictable calendar for the committee to plan around.

Safety, Insurance, and Compliance Risk

Reactive maintenance increases the odds that a fault is discovered by someone getting hurt, a system failing at the worst possible moment, or an insurer questioning why a known issue was not addressed sooner. Planned maintenance, with documented inspections and service records, supports a stronger levies, finances and insurance position and gives committees a defensible record if a claim or dispute arises later. Insurers increasingly ask for maintenance records as part of renewal or claims assessment, so a documented planned approach can also support more favourable terms over time.

Signs A Scheme is Trapped in Reactive Work

Common warning signs include a maintenance budget that is consistently overspent, the same assets failing repeatedly, contractors being engaged on an emergency basis more often than a scheduled one, and committees hearing about problems from frustrated owners rather than from inspection reports. If most of a scheme's maintenance spend is unplanned, the scheme is effectively managing itself by crisis rather than by design. Turnover in committee members is another quiet indicator, since volunteers tend to burn out faster on a scheme that always feels like it is fighting fires.

How To Shift To Planned Maintenance

The move usually starts with an asset register and condition assessment, followed by a realistic schedule built around actual risk rather than an arbitrary calendar. Project management support helps sequence the work so it fits the budget and does not overwhelm the committee in a single year. The shift does not happen overnight, but even a partial move, starting with the highest risk items, reduces exposure quickly. Many committees find it easier to fund this transition gradually, treating it as its own capital works item within the fund rather than trying to absorb the full cost of an assessment in a single year.

Budget and Reporting Model

Planned maintenance pairs naturally with a funded capital works fund and special levy strategy, because future works are known in advance rather than discovered after a failure. Regular reporting to the committee, comparing planned spend against actual spend, keeps the model honest and gives owners confidence that levies are being applied to a genuine plan. This approach reflects the funding guidance set out for preparing and reviewing contracts and works in NSW.

Decision Checklist For Committees

Before the next budget cycle, committees can ask themselves a few direct questions. 

• Do we have an up-to-date asset register? 
• Can we name our highest risk asset right now? 
• Has more than a small share of this year's maintenance spend been unplanned? 
• Is our capital works fund forecast built from actual condition data or a rough guess? 

Honest answers to these questions usually make the case for planned maintenance on their own, without needing to be argued.  Reviewing these questions once a year, ideally ahead of the annual general meeting, keeps the conversation proactive rather than reactive in itself.

Move From Reactive To Planned Maintenance

If your scheme is spending more on emergencies than it should, it is worth reviewing where the gaps are. Request a maintenance and project review, and we will help you map a realistic, funded plan. You are also welcome to contact us with questions before committing to anything. Even a short conversation about where your scheme currently sits can help clarify whether a full assessment is the right next step or whether a smaller, targeted change would make the biggest difference first.